Judge Madden: "Brilliant" Judge or totally unfit for office?

In the Don Miller, Susan Aguado, and many other cases, Judge Patrick J. Madden has demonstrated his total incompetence, absolute lack of ethics, utter disregard for the judiciary and rights of defendants, a total disregard for the lives of our citizens and families, and he has acted to obstruct justice. He has conspired to deprive rights, aided and abetted crime, ruled perversely in cases where he had a personal interest or grudge against a person appearing in a case, and has offered illegal judicial favors in exchange for sex. This clearly is felony misconduct in public office, and he deserves time in prison.

Madden's intentional ongoing mishandling of the Don Miller and Susan Aguado cases has created a hornet's nest of public discontent, and the public is very angry with the total sham, gross injustice and culture of corruption perpetrated upon them by Judge Madden.

Judge Madden has also lied through his teeth in the face of the overwhelming evidence against him and sees nothing wrong with lying when confronted with his misconduct. Judge Madden has clearly demonstrated an absolute unfitness for the public office of circuit court judge, who is supposed to be a community's moral leader, yet Madden is anything but moral. He has abused his power not only in the Don Miller and Susan Aguado cases, but in many others as well - just a few of which are listed below.

Judge Patrick Madden has repeatedly exceeded his authority in order to cause harm to people he doesn't like, or as a favor to his personal friends and lovers who appear in the cases before him. He has also repeatedly and very clearly demonstrated hi utter disregard for our constitutional right, the law, statutes, and higher court rulings. He has destroyed human lies and families without any proper factual or legal basis for his actions and he once imposed a life sentence on a man where such a sentence was not permitted under the law.

Judge Madden has also sentenced men guilty of sexual assault to only 90-days in jail and when a local 15-year old girl was sexually assauted by a 22-year old man who also happens to be a relative of the current District Attorney, Martin J. Lipske, Madden gave him only 90-days in jail, 90-days of probation after that and then expunged (erased) his conviction after he had completed probation. And if that wasn't enouh of an insult to the teenage victim and her family, Judge Patrick Madden justified his actions by saying: "Because he wore a condom, it was not rape." This judge must be removed from office!

The ongoing intentional perversion of justic in the Don Miller and Susan Aguado cases continues to cause Don and Susan and their loved ones untold misery and heartaches. The details and facts of their cases is all over the internet and we encourage you to learn about these two cases here on the website.

Madden's incompetence and intentional misdeeds has destroyed lives and families, which includes the recent suicide of on Miller's son, Kirk Selves, who couldn't take the injustice perpetrated upon his father anymore. He committed suicide to get your attention to what Madden is doing to his dad, Don Miller. Please, do not ignore Kirk's final plea.

The cases below represent just a sampling of Judge Patrick Madden's mishandled cases which were overturned by higher courts due to his gross mishandling of the cases. These cases and may others ike them, represent a huge waste of millions of dollars in taxpayer money due to costs of appeals and additional and unnecessary court proceedings to correct Madden's blunders and huge costs to litigants suffering perverted rulings who must continue paying attorney fees for appeals and then starting all over after Madden's decisions and orders are finally overturned by higher courts. Here are a few such cases:

• In two of the Jennifer B. cases, (337 Wis. 2d 558, and 337 Wis. 2d 429) Judge Patrick Madden had in both cases wrongly terminated Jennifer's parental rights to her own children, one of them an infant. The appellate court overturned Madden's decisions and orders in both cases because Madden had arrogantly and incompetently refused to obey statutory mandates and rules, wrongly altered critical jury instructions, and denied Jennifer's right to a jury trial on a contested issue. The appeals court had also noted that Judge Madden had completely "muddled" the record.

• In the case of Miheve v. Miheve (330 Wis. 2d 497) Judge Patrick Maddens decisions and orders were overturned because Madden had arrogantly and incompetently refused to obey well established rules of due process and failed to rovide a proper hearing to the litigant. An obviously upset appellate court overturned Madden's decisions and ordered Madden to conduct a proper hearing. Madden's violations were so flagrant and contrary to established procedure and due process that the appellate court stated in it decision that, "this is not the sort of issue that an appellate court should have to address."

• In the case of Anderson v. Dieman (324 Wis. 2d 307) the appeals court had to overturn Judge Patrick Madden's rulings and decisions because Madden had misapplied the law to the facts of the case.

• In the case of State v. Thomas Martwick (322 Wis. 2d 735) the appeals court had to overturn Judge Madden's rulings and decisions because Madden had misapplied the law to the facts of the case.

• In the case of Trailwood Ventures (315 Wis. 2d 791) the appeals court had to overturn Judge Madden's rulings and decisions because Madden had once again exceeded his authority.

• In the case of Malek v. Van Prooyen (314 Wis. 2d 509) the appeals cort overturned Judge Madden's decision and orders becase Madden refused to follow proper procedure, refused to allow the defendant to litigate his issues, refused to hold a hearing and failed to make a proper record. The appeals court sent the case back to Madden and directed him to conduct the required hearing and to make a proper record. Madden then held the hearing but again ruled against the defendant, wh had to appeal again. And once again the appeals court overturned Madden's decision and orders and once again directed him to properly address the defendant's issues and once again, to make a proper record.

• In the case of Myers v. Myers (241 Wis. 2d 573) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had applied the wrong legal standard of law, "deviated" from applicable guidelines, and abused his discretion.

• In the case of Haas v. Estate of Berube (238 Wis. 2d 839) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had abused his discretion by denying a new trial after again misapplying the law.

• In the case of State v. Thoms (228 Wis. 2d 868) the appeals court overturned Judge Patrick Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had misapplied the law and rules of evidece and these errors contributed to the conviction. Moreover, Madden lacked the authority to impose a life sentence on the defendant, so the sentence was invalidated.

• In the case of State v. Lord (220 Wis. 2d 718) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden misappied the law and also improperly excluded evidence in gross violation of the defendant's right to present a defense.

• In the case of James Sweo Children's Trust (300 Wis. 2d 581) the appeals court overturned Judge Patrick Madden's decisions and orders because Madden improperly considered information from outside the pleadings to reach his decision and improperly converted the pleadings without giving the Trust an opportunity to object or respond.

• In the case of Skomarske v. Skomarske (277 Wis. 2d 582) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had no basis in fact or law for his decisions in the case.

• In the case of State v. Troyer (269 Wis. 2d 891) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had made improper findings of fact and law.

• In the case of Associated Bank v. Pufall (257 Wis. 2d 622) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders becuase there was no factual basis to support Maddens findings which were also wholly unsupported by the recor and were "clearly erroneous".

• In the case of State v. Paulson (242 Wis. 2d 473) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had insufficient proof or other evidence with which to support his decision and order.

• In the case of State v. Nichelson (220 Wis. 2d 214) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had failed to follow proper and well established procedures.

• In the case of State v. Nordall (207 Wis. 2d 646) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had applied the wrong standards of law during a hearing.

• In the case of Fenn Galleries v. Stasiak (No. 92-2940) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had misapplied the law and abused his discretion in the case.

• In the case of State v. Lehman (No. 92-2283) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had improperly allowed inadmissible evidence to be admitted, in direct violation of the defendant's consitutional rights.

• In the case of In Interest of S.E.S. (168 Wis. 2d 360) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had relied upon inapplicable legal principles and had once again exceeded his legal authority in the case.

• In the case of State v. Vetterneck (156 Wis. 2d 826) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had misapplied the law and facts when he sentenced the defendant.

• In the case of State v. Novitt (155 Wis. 2d 468) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had improperly applied law in his disposition of the case.

• In the case of Thorsen v. Thorsen (155 Wis. 2d 466) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had failed to explain the basis for his decision, abused his discretion, ignored statutory directives and binding higher court precedent and also failed to make proper and adequate findings of fact in the case.

• In the case of Kidd v. Buss (152 Wis. 2d 774) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had failed to follow the statutory rules and also did not adequately or properly conduct the required proceedings in the case.

• In the case of Ames v. Young (152 Wis. 2d 775) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden's findings were fully unsupported by the record and there were insufficient facts to support his order in the case.

• In the case of Melvin Klinger (149 Wis. 2d 838) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had exceeded his statutory authority in the case, applied the wrong legal standards to the issues in the case and Madden also wrongly failed to make a proper record of the case. The Wisconsin Supreme Court also later agreed with the appeals court, finding that Madden had fully bungled the case.

• In the case of Knapstein v. Knapstein (149 Wis. 2d 765) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had ignored the proper legal standards that were applicable to the case.

• In the case of Klinger v. County (146 Wis. 2d 158) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had exceeded his authority and ignored the law and applicable statutes.

• In the case of Jensen v. American Family Insurance Co. (146 Wis. 2d 866) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders because Madden had violated statutes and binding court precedent.

• In the case of Bill v. Thiessen (142 Wis. 2d 937) the appeals court overturned Judge Madden's decisions and orders due to Madden's "miscalculations".

------------------------------------------

In addition to the above sampling of bungled cases, there is also Judge Madden's perverse personal lifestyle which includes him being a longtime self-professed alcoholic, drunk driver, his frequenting of strip clubs, his interest in strippers and prostitutes and he has also been removed from a public place by local police for indecency. Clearly, this is not a man you would want for a neighbor, much less as a judge you must rely on to properly protect your rights, ensure due process of law, or to decide your case or your future. Hell no.

Without any doubt and before any more lives are destroyed or additonal millions of dollars are wasted, we must have this rogue judge Patrick J. Madden removed from public office of circuit court judge as soon as possible and he must be held responsible for his criminal activities.

Patrick J. Madden has already inflicted more than enough unwarranted suffering and misery on our citizens, our families, our friends and our neighbors.

Enough is enough already!